Should super targets be reset lower?

6 September 2019
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Investment experts, including superannuation funds, are not considering the impact of the mounting global economic crisis when creating investment targets and forecasts, Rice Warner believes.

In an analysis, the research house questioned whether the last 10 years of positive returns for mainstream funds had made funds complacent even though the risk of a downturn was now much higher. 

“The median estimates for Australian equities have varied from 7.6% to 8.2% a year over the next decade, which is a narrow range.  Hedged international equities have been slightly lower (higher taxes and no franking credits), with a similar narrow range of 7.0% to 7.7%,” it said.

“Surprisingly, government bonds have also been in a narrow range (2.75% increasing to 3.5% in 2019 survey) and cash is flat at 3% to 3.3%, even though interest rates have moved considerably down over the last four years.”

It said these narrow ranges showed that investment experts were sticking to conventional forecasts of future performance and not building in global economic crises impact.

“Should funds be telling members that they are likely to average returns of 5% over the next decade, rather than the 7% to which members have become accustomed?” it said.

“Should the targets be reset lower in an environment of extremely high real asset prices and a decline in world growth (and future profitability)? Should we consider whether 10 years of ‘lower-for-longer’ has expanded to permanently lower interest rates, and a different normal state?”

Rice Warner said baby-boomers who were gradually transitioning into retirement would be the most affected. While retirees now were drawing the minimum pension of 5% up to age 75 when their fund was earning 7%, this would not be the case for those retiring now.

“Fund communications, including retirement calculators, need to show the impact of potentially worse outcomes relative to the past.  Consequently, more members will need to draw down their capital earlier,” it said.

Rice Warner noted that super funds needed to prepare members for much lower nominal returns in a low interest rate and inflation environment and tolerating higher levels of volatility if they were to have a reasonable change of achieving adequate long-term returns.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Avenue 17

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communica...

4 hours ago
Robert Segue

Sounds like a schoolyard childish scrap! take it behind the shelter sheds and sort it out! Really Publicly listed compa...

1 day 4 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

iN THE END IT IS THE REGULATORS FAULT. wHILE I WAS WORKING I WAS ALLWAYS AMAZED AT HOW UNTHINKING SOME CLIENTS WERE! I...

1 day 8 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND