Safe to extract default funds from awards - roundtable

7 January 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The success of MySuper in driving up standards combined with the increasingly proactive communications approach of many industry funds has created an environment in which default superannuation can be safely removed from awards.

That was the assessment of a panellists on a recent roundtable conducted by Money Management's sister publication, Super Review, with Towers Watson managing director, Andrew Boal and Deloitte Partner, Russell Mason, agreeing that while some protections were necessary the development of MySuper products had changed the equation.

Former Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) chairperson and current super fund trustee director, Jocelyn Furlan argued that protections were needed particularly in circumstances where some institutions were prepared to use their superannuation products as loss-leaders for other arms of their business.

"… I think there is a real issue about what the system looks like if some of the protections are taken away, where you've got funds that do other things as well and can use their superannuation fund as a loss leader for something else," she said.

Furlan said that institutions could "actually influence employers to join a fund not because that fund is right for their employees, but because there are possibly ancillary benefits because it's a big retail organisation that has other financial relationships with that employer".

However both Boal and Mason said that while protections were needed, the MySuper regime together with a more proactive approach by many industry funds had changed the dynamic.

"My Super has set the bar at a certain level. APRA have really regulated what's an acceptable superannuation fund with the My Super licensing. My view is that should be enough. That if they're eligible under the My Super license then they should be eligible to be considered by an employer as a default fund, and it's up to the individual funds, retail and industry, to sell the merits of their fund to employers," Mason said.

"…industry funds, to their credit, have been doing that. Most haven't just been sitting back on their laurels and saying we've got employees locked in because of an Award system," he said. "They go out there, they sell themselves to the employers, they sell themselves to the members. I think that's a healthy competition."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND