PC complexity will drive up super costs

28 November 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The complexity around the assessment framework of the Productivity Commission's review of the superannuation system's competitiveness and efficiency will increase costs for members, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

Commenting on the PC's report, which was released on 25 November, ASFA chief executive, Dr Martin Fahy, expressed concerns while acknowledging the challenges that laid in assessing the efficiency and competitiveness of the super system and the PC's efforts to analyse the impact of the regulation.

"However, given there are 89 unique indicators and 22 criteria to assess in this framework, ASFA believes it will make it difficult for the commission to draw meaningful conclusions," Fahy said.

Fahy also noted 17 per cent of the indicators would require new data to be obtained from the industry, which he said would burden the industry despite some of the reporting being voluntary.

"Ultimately, higher data costs for the industry are borne by members and the industry is already subject to extensive data reporting and compliance requirements," he said.

The PC said it would attempt to draw on existing data to the extent possible, including regulator data and data that could be sourced from the private sector. It would also attempt to source it from published information such as product disclosure statements and annual reports.

"Only a minor share of indicators will rely on new data collections, and these will be via surveys (of funds and members) and case studies," the report said.

The Financial Services Council (FSC) supported the PC's commitment to assess the competitiveness of the current default funds market, which the FSC said was "not conducive to competition by incumbent industry funds".

FSC chief executive, Sally Loane, said: "In particular, the PC is correct to have called out consistent underperformance by some incumbent default industry funds".

Loane also said the FSC supported the PC's focus on lower fees, product innovation, and higher returns.

"For too long now the anti-competitive and outdated industrial system has stifled competition and in many cases left consumers worse off," she said.

The PC's commissioner, Angela MacRae, said the commission's focus was on the whole system.

"This is not about comparing the performance of individual super funds or products," she said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND