Lonsec looks to break-down contradictory super descriptors

6 August 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Research and ratings house Lonsec has sought to end the sometimes contradictory labels used by superannuation funds and asset managers to describe their asset allocations.

Lonsec chief executive, Charlie Haynes said there had been a long-running debate on how certain asset types should be categorised with investment managers and superannuation funds having differences stances on which assets to include and what proportion of members’ funds to allocate.

“The challenge for advisers is that two super funds might offer a ‘balanced’ option, each with significantly different asset allocations leading to diverging retirement outcomes,” he said. “Failing to understand an investment option’s actual asset allocation can also mean there is a risk that the option does not meet the licensee’s policies and guidelines, resulting in potential non-compliance.”

“Super funds use labels like ‘growth’ or ‘defensive’ to characterise an investment option’s asset allocation, but often these don’t tell the full story,” Haynes said

“Understanding the underlying asset allocation, how it aligns to a client’s risk profile and how it compares to peers is essential for financial advisers who have a duty to act in their clients’ best interests.”

Haynes said that to overcome the issue, Lonsec had launched a Super Asset Allocation comparison tool powered by Lonsec’s stablemate, SuperRatings, which is intended to allow advisers to compare asset allocations of up to five fund options and benchmark them against Lonsec’s own strategic and dynamic asset allocations.

“It’s not our job to tell advisers which asset allocation is most suitable for their clients, but we can make sure they have access to all the information they need to make a fully informed recommendation,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 10 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 11 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 10 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND