Longevity risk solutions key to retaining superannuation fund members

26 September 2011
| By Angela Welsh |
image
image
expand image

Institutional superannuation funds should offer longevity risk solutions to retain members, according to delegates at a recent Retirement Income Forum convened by Pimco. 

The forum, held in Sydney and Melbourne, found the consensus fund sector view was for a hybrid longevity risk product. These products combine a guarantee and a separate investment product, wrapped as one single offering to retirees, to provide a more cost-effective solution than those currently available in the retail market. 

A research paper by Tony Hildyard and Sara Higgins of Pimco Australia detailed traditional ways of addressing longevity risk and the Australian market for these strategies. The paper, Addressing Longevity Risk, identified longevity protection as one of the most complex issues faced by retirees. 

"Longevity risk remains the major unsolved problem with growth-based investment solutions conflicting with retirees' heightened risk aversion - that is, lack of certainty," said Hildyard, who is Pimco Australia's head of retirement solutions. 

While retirees with superannuation savings of under $250,000 would have access to the age pension, those with more than that amount would have to consider their options, the report stated. Retirees with more than $1 million in superannuation would most likely be able to address longevity risk via an asset allocation strategy, but might still "bucket" a portion of their assets into a true longevity protection product, the report said.

"Generally, an asset allocation approach has been followed - including the use of income funds or asset bucketing, in an attempt to minimise risks of running out of assets before death - but this approach does not fully address longevity risk," Hildyard said. 

Hildyard conceded that the trend to take up a lump sum on retirement was "an entirely rational reaction" to this conflict. However, he cautioned that such an approach would not be optimal for the retiree and super fund. Hildyard called for an in-fund solution which focused on retiree needs and risk appetite. 

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND