ISA claims inquiry backing for default funds

9 February 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has begun describing default funds under modern awards as a "superannuation safety net" for workers who do not actively select their own fund and something which has been backed by three separate Government inquiries.

The ISA has initiated a campaign in which it is claiming that the big banks are seeking to undermine that safety net.

The campaign appears to be aimed at directly countering the arguments of the Financial Services Council (FSC) that the default funds regime should be opened up to competition with all elgible MySuper funds available for selection.

However, ISA chief executive, David Whiteley issued a statement late last week in which he sought to claim that three inquiries had specifically backed the existing default funds under modern awards regime.

He claimed complexity, choice overload, low levels of financial literacy, lack of planning, procrastination and high search costs, among other behavioural factors, were influencing Australians' approach to their superannuation savings.

"This is the lived reality of our super system, in which eight in ten people don't actively select their own fund," he said and claimed that there had been consensus on the issue by the Cooper Review, the Productivity Commission and the Financial System Inquiry.

"These independent inquiries agree the existing safety net of better performing funds should remain in place and be subject to a ‘quality filter'," he said. "This default system has been overseen successfully for many years by the Fair Work Commission and implemented throughout awards and workplace agreements for people who don't actively choose a fund."

Whiteley claimed that despite this, "bank-owned super funds are continuing a campaign to scrap the safety net".

"The banks, which already dominate 80 per cent of the household banking market, are now seeking a greater share of the superannuation market," he said. "However, because of their inability for more than a decade to match the returns of the industry super fund sector (on average), bank-owned super funds want to avoid any obligation to compete on investment performance."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

8 hours 39 minutes ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

5 days 3 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 5 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND