Has PC opened SMSFs to attack?

30 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The self-managed superannuation funds (SMSF) sector risks being attacked by other segments of the superannuation industry because of the Productivity Commission’s (PC’s) draft report findings that SMSFs with less than $10 million in total assets have lower returns than some Australian Prudential Regulation Authority-regulated funds.

That is the warning from Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand, which has directly questioned the PC’s methodology, particularly its use of total returns to assess fund performance.

At the same time, the accountancy body has warned the PC against reading too much into the establishment of smaller SMSFs, in circumstances where its members had told it that the majority of smaller balance SMSFs were established for a specific purpose and would not have a low balance for an extended period of time.

“The continuing publicity about poor behaviour within large financial organisations, including industry funds, directly and indirectly also encourages consumers to take control of their own retirement affairs,” it said.

In a submission responding to the PC, Chartered Accountants ANZ said that, ideally, the PC needed to adjust its assessment process and be open to revisiting some of its initial conclusions.

“We are concerned that the Commission’s findings about the SMSF sector – especially that SMSFs with less than $10 million in total assets have lower returns than some APRA-regulated funds – may be used by others to attack that sector primarily for competitive reasons,” the Chartered Accountants ANZ said.

The submission argued that while the PC’s use of net total returns represented a popular methodology, the deficits needed to be understood.

“… a focus on total return figures makes it easier to charge fees based on a percentage of assets under management, especially within a unitised investment fund,” it said. “And it encourages greater turnover of assets as investment managers will attempt to chase the ‘in your face’ capital returns rather than the more sedate, significantly less exciting, income returns.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 15 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 16 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 15 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND