Funds cautious on divorce super splits

3 December 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation funds should not be compelled to develop templated arrangements to help divorcing couples split their superannuation, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

While supporting simplification of the laws around divorce and superannuation, ASFA told the Australian Law Reform Commission that it does not agree that superannuation trustees should be required to develop standard splitting orders based on common scenarios.

In doing so, it said this would be effectively bringing superannuation funds into the divorce as a third party.

ASFA cited one member fund which advised that it completed around 2,000 family law responses a year and generally objected to around 20 per cent of the draft orders on the basis that they were poorly worded.

“This fund regularly encounters situations where the parties have used a standard template but have made amendments or included other orders that are inconsistent with the template,” the ASFA submission said.

Discussing the templating issue, the submission said, “Not only does this impose an unduly onerous obligation on the trustee - a third party - but there is a risk that a member and/or non-member spouse may rely on a ‘standard’ splitting order that is not appropriate to their circumstances and which may result in detriment”.

“If it were considered that superannuation splitting orders - in accumulation funds - are sufficiently uniform as to facilitate the creation of one or more standard orders then it would be appropriate if these were to be developed by the Family Court as a form, authorised by the Principal Registrar and published on the Family Court website,” it said. “In any event, standard forms should not apply to defined benefit schemes, due to the nature and complexity of defined benefit interests.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 3 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 4 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND