Fair Work panel needed to lift super default standards

21 January 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has called on the Government to appoint members to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) Expert Panel to allow the panel to ensure that only high-quality superannuation funds are named as default funds in modern awards.

ISA said it was critical for the panel to bet default funds to ensure appropriate funds received employer super contributions on behalf of those employees who did not exercise choice in a submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Economics regarding the Treasury Laws Amendment (Your Super Your Choice Bill 2019).

It said funds that wanted to manage default contributions whether by being a modern award or an enterprise agreement should meet a high standard and needed to deliver net returns above a transparent performance benchmark.

“The same member interest first approach…should be applied by the FWC when employers and employees seek ratification of enterprise agreements that contain a restriction on choice of superannuation fund,” ISA said.

“ISA’s analysis in 2017 of a sample of enterprise agreements ratified by the FWC found that 82% of all employees covered by agreements had no restriction on choice of fund and that only 1.9% of the workforce had some form of restriction on choice of fund.

“…Where choice was restricted there were specific factors, including the provision of industry relevant insurance in high-risk industries; mechanisms to provide for compliance and payment of superannuation contributions in industries with high rates of noncompliance and additional superannuation benefits, including higher than super guarantee contribution rates.”

ISA noted there should be a presumption that choice of superannuation fund would be available to employees.

“Where an agreement proposes, following collective endorsement by employees and the employer, that the choice of superannuation fund is restricted, it is appropriate that the FWC be empowered to approve the restriction of choice where it can be demonstrated that doing so is in the interests of the employees covered by the terms of the relevant enterprise agreement by reference to the quality of the nominated superannuation fund.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND