AFA urges Govt not to undermine group life

11 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Government’s legislative push to make insurance within superannuation “opt-in” for those aged under 25 will likely result in a decline in the competitive position of group insurance, according to the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).

In a submission filed with the Senate Economics Legislation Committee inquiry into the Government’s legislation, the AFA said that while this decline in the competitive position of group insurance would help advisers in the retail life arena this did not obscure the fact that consumers risked being seriously disadvantaged.

The AFA questioned why the Government was rushing towards implementation of the legislation and questioned whether the haste was being driven by ideology.

“These life insurance reforms appear to come from the ideological view that it is better to save a larger number of people a smaller amount of money, rather than protect a smaller number of people in the event of a life changing insurance event,” the AFA submission said.

“This is the opposite of the underlying principle of insurance. There are personal consequences of this decision that will significantly detrimentally impact many people in these groups who experience a life insurance event that they are not insured against as a result of these reforms,” it said. “This is a big decision for a Government to make.”

In questioning the reasons for the speed with which the legislation had been introduced, the AFA suggested the Government would have been better served waiting for the findings of the Productivity Commission’s (PC’s) review of default superannuation.

Further, it said it would have made sense for the PC itself to have considered the consequences of the legislative package as part of its current inquiry.

“We should make the point early on in this submission that the impact of these reforms is likely to result in a decline in the competitive position of Group insurance, which will positively impact upon the relative competitiveness of retail advised life insurance,” the AFA said.

“We are not expressing our views in this submission in an effort to protect the interest of our members, who predominantly advise on retail advised life insurance, which will not be directly impacted. It is actually quite the opposite, in that these reforms will increase the cost of Group insurance and make it easier for our members to find insurance options that are better than the Group super arrangements.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 16 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 17 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND