Minimum SMSF balance of $250,000 more accurate

As industry bodies such as SuperConcepts and the SMSF Association welcome the Productivity Commission’s revision of the minimum viability threshold for self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) to $500,000, the former has warned that it is still a misleadingly high figure.

The company believed that a minimum member balance of $250,000 was a more accurate measure of cost-effectiveness, which was closer to the guidance provided by the Australian Taxation Office.

“We’re concerned that the Productivity Commission report has potentially confused the market in distinguishing between a fund balance and a member balance for the minimum viability of an SMSF,” SuperConcepts chief executive, Natasha Fenech, said.

Related News:

“The vast majority of funds have more than one member and this needs to be absolutely clear when issuing guidance and potential accountability to professionals about how much money makes an SMSF worthwhile.”

Fenech also endorsed the Commission’s call to have require specialist qualifications for SMSF advice.




Related Content

Election should be used to address unpaid super: ISA

Workers who are being ripped off superannuation from their employers are falling even further behind in retirement savings that those who are receivin...Read more

Accounting body alleges the ALP misled the public on advice fees

Labor’s estimations on accountants’ fees for providing tax advice are based on a sample size so small that it could be producing “grossly overst...Read more

PC’s top 10 funds could have unfair “liquidity advantage”

The Productivity Commission’s controversial ‘best in show’ default super fund list could prove unchangeable, as economies of scale see the 10 fu...Read more

Author

Comments

Add new comment