Necessary tweaks needed for JobKeeper 2.0: IPA

21 July 2020
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The stimulus initiatives to date have not distinguished between viable and non-viable business, and the government needs to make this distinction to ensure JobKeeper 2.0 is effective, according to the Institute of Public Accountants (IPA).

The IPA recommended JobKeeper be changed to address the following:

  • The way a new business, that commenced operations from 1 January 2020, reports on goods and services tax (GST) should not determine whether they are in or out of the JobKeeper scheme;
  • Review of the declining turnover eligibility test: JobKeeper 2.0 should be better targeted to support those who continue to suffer during this pandemic; and
  • Review the flat payment structure of JobKeeper and whether it should be a proportional payment.

Andrew Conway, IPA chief executive, said JobKeeper had achieved many of its intended outcomes, particularly by not adding Australian workers onto JobSeeker.

“It is understandable that there were some design flaws considering the short time given for its implementation,” Conway said.

Although the Government should be commended for its initial introduction, Conway said too many changes would erode community confidence.

“However, there were also benefits and we need to ensure that we don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater; we should recognise what good has been achieved by this initiative,” Conway said.

“There is also an opportunity for the Government to provide direct assistance to adversely affected industries beyond September.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 15 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 16 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 15 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND