More doubt thrown on reality of churn
Further doubt has been thrown on the existence of a significant life/risk ‘churn’ problem, with a Parliamentary committee having been told that just under 75 per cent of lapses occur among clients aged over 50.
The Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) inquiry into the life insurance industry has received a detailed response to questions on notice from MLC Life Insurance which appears to seriously undermine suggestions that a significant churn problem actually exists.
The MLC response said that the three leading reported causes of lapse across the total MLC Life Insurance book were:
- A change in customer need;
- Affordability; and
- Switching to a competitor product.
“Together these reasons account for 80 per cent of all lapses,” the answers to the questions on notice said.
The answer follows on from recent regulator testimony to the PJC that not all churn can be deemed to be bad.
According to the MLC Life answers to the questions on notice, across MLC Life Insurance’s total retail insurance book lapse rates are currently running at approximately 15 per cent of premiums in force.
“Of lapsing members approximately 74 per cent are aged over 50. Most often these members lapse their policy as the protection afforded by their policy is no longer required,” the insurance company said.
“Of the remaining 26 per cent of lapsing members, approximately 20 per cent are aged between 40 and 50 and the remaining six per cent is aged under 40,” it said. “For these cohorts the cause of lapse are more likely to be due to affordability, switching to a competitor product or other reasons.”
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
