Licensees earn their stamping fees and should keep them
“Not a day goes by without the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and other regulators making some half-baked announcement, designed to drive a wedge between consumers and service providers” and seeking to abolish stamping fees is one such example.
That is the analysis of the founder and managing director of the Investment Collective, David French, who has used a submission to Treasury on the Stamping Fees Exemption to argue that current arrangements should be maintained and simply reflect the consider work put in by financial services licensees.
“Let’s be clear from the start – stamping fees are a fee,” his submission said. “They are paid by product issuers, and they compensate for significant effort on the part of the AFSL holder. Assuming a desirable investment opportunity, these fees are earned in a very competitive environment, where a number of AFSL holders are vying for a limited amount of stock on offer.
The submission said that while the new Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) code of ethics precluded advisers from receiving stamping fees, the same did not apply to licensees.
“There is however no rule preventing a Financial Services Licensee from receiving stamping fees, and neither should there be. Stamping fees are intended to offset the administrative burden of taking on a new issue,” it said.
French released his submission to Money Management in the context of the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA’s) submission having backed the banning of stamping fees.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
