IPA calls out shortcomings of FBT net
Out-dated and old-fashioned rules are seeing bus catchers benefit over workers using other modes of public transport, with salary package bus travel slipping through the fringe benefits tax (FBT), according to the Institute of Public Accountants (IPA).
IPA chief executive officer, Andrew Conway, said that the loophole was a benefit for bus catchers, but did not bode well for workers who used other methods of public transport, and demonstrated the inconsistencies of the FBT.
"This ruling allows a person to salary package bus travel… normally for taxation purposes, this travel is considered private," he said.
"However, this ruling confirms the anomaly, providing a tax break relating to bus transport whereas such a benefit does not apply to any other form of public transport."
Conway said that a bus did not fall within the definition of a car under FBT definitions, but those who relied on trams, trains and ferries did not qualify for the salary packaging benefit. Conway said the IPA had called for an overhaul of the FBT rules in the past, which it deemed unsuitable.
"It is an inconsistency within the tax regime that does not sit well… in a world where we are trying to encourage the use of public transport for congestion and environmental reasons, it is hard to justify this outcome," he said.
"[The] rules are well past their use by date and no longer reflect modern work practices."
Conway said FBT was the most difficult and expensive tax for employers and that small efforts to address issues surrounding it had not stemmed ongoing issues.
"The approach has been that of band-aid fixes which has not addressed the complexities associated with FBT," he said.
"This ridiculous outcome is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to FBT."
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
