Govt accused of failure on vertical integration

5 April 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Parliament has been told it needs to act against vertical integration within the financial services industry in circumstances where recent Government legislation, including that underpinning the Life Insurance Framework (LIF), had failed to do so.

The Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA) has used a submission to the Senate Economics Committee inquiry into consumer protection in the banking, insurance and financial sector to point to what it described as “recent controversies” including those related to CommInsure and claims handling.

“It is apparent that action is needed now to deal with the vertically-integrated sales model, which remains rife in the advice industry. Yet the Corporations Amendment (Life Insurance Remuneration Arrangements) Bill 2016 which finally passed both houses in February 2017 does not provide any substantive reform on this issue,” the submission said. “The Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer, instead previously entrusted the industry with ‘responsibility for widening approved product lists (APLs) through the development of a new industry standard.”

“Given the advice industry’s poor track record of self-regulation, and its manifest commercial interest in continuing to sell ‘in-house’ products, such an approach is troubling and it is unsurprising that no significant change has occurred to date,” it said.

The submission said O'Dwyer’s October 2016 announcement in relation to adviser remuneration “fails to address significant concerns regarding APLs”.

“The practice of providing vertically-integrated advice whereby advisers recommend financial products (including life risk insurance) of entities to which they are associated, to the exclusion of more suitable non-affiliated products, is widespread in the industry,” it said.

The ALA said legislative reform was needed now to require financial advisers to demonstrate that they consider and recommend both affiliated and non-affiliated products.

“Specifically, that could be achieved by making the following improvements:

  • Requiring that APLs include a balance of affiliated and non-affiliated products, and/or a minimum proportion of non-affiliated products from a reputable provider; and
  • Requiring that, if a statement of advice (SOA) produced for a customer recommends an affiliated product, that should be disclosed and the SOA should show a comparison with one or more non-affiliated products to demonstrate that the affiliated product is more appropriate.”
Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND