Extend the BEAR to all financial services says CHOICE

3 November 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Consumer group Choice and the Consumer Action Law Centre (CALC) want the Bank Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) extended beyond the banking centre to other financial services organisations and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) given equal powers with those of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).

Such a move would see the BEAR extended to cover financial planning businesses.

The two bodies have used a joint submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee inquiry into the BEAR legislation to argue that it does not go far enough and should be focused on dealing with consumer detriment as well as prudential matters.

“While we support the BEAR reforms, we believe improvements could be made to the bill to ensure that the accountability regime better links executive remuneration and any penalties to widespread consumer harm,” the submission said. “We also believe that it is imperative that ASIC is given equivalent powers to ensure it can effectively regulate non-ADI [bank] entities.”

It suggested this could be achieved via the proposed ASIC product intervention powers, or by extending ASIC’s current powers to disqualify people from managing companies or engaging in financial services.

“We note that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is extending the United Kingdom’s equivalent regime to cover insurers and non-prudentially regulated firms as well as banks,” the submission said.

It said the BEAR legislation had restricted the application of the BEAR so it would only apply to “conduct that is systemic and prudential in nature”.

“This misses the crucial elements of the United Kingdom model that ties accountability measures to poor consumer outcomes, not just prudential matters,” it said. “Under the proposed model, we are concerned that executives may still avoid direct consequences for scandals similar to those identified by the Review of the Four Major Banks (also known as the Coleman Report) as harmful to consumers. No executive was terminated following the scandals identified in the report.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND