ASIC wants powers beyond its FOFA mandate
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) wants powers beyond those contained in the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) legislation to deal with misconduct in the financial planning industry.
The regulator has used its submission to the Senate Economic Committee inquiry into consumer protection in the banking, insurance and financial sector to state that while the FOFA reforms were an important step in moving the financial advice industry away from a commission-driven distribution network to a professional services industry, ASIC considered further moves are necessary.
“We consider that there are still some areas of the broader regulatory regime that could be addressed to minimise misconduct and poor quality advice in the future,” the submission said.
It said additional reforms to enhance ASIC’s powers to control licensee conduct and to give it more flexible enforcement options would assist the regulator to minimise the risk of misconduct by, “for example:
(a) Directing licensees to undertake compliance remediation and compensation actions;
(b) Banning individuals from managing or being involved in a financial services business; and
(c) Issuing infringement notices for less serious misconduct.
Elsewhere in its submission, ASIC pointed out to the Senate committee the need for it to be able to utilise both competition and product intervention powers.
It said there was a close link between competition considerations and a product intervention power for ASIC and that providing the regulator with a competition mandate and product intervention powers would “enable us to be a more proactive and effective regulator”.
“A competition mandate would allow us to consider and address consumer detriment more broadly,” the submission said. “…we would not need to rely on specific concerns in relation to legislative compliance to consider market failures causing poor conduct and consumer detriment. We would be able to use the proposed product intervention powers to directly address such market failures.”
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.