ASIC told to justify user-pays fees
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has been urged to justify the fees it intends charging under its new fee-for-service model by publishing detailed data about the make-up of fees.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has urged greater transparency around ASIC’s new fee regime, especially in circumstances where, in some cases, fees are significantly higher than the current fee regime.
In a submission filed with ASIC this week, ASFA said transparency and accountability were critical features of any industry funding model.
“With respect to the ASIC fees‐for‐service regime, a robust accountability and transparency framework is required in order to provide ASIC’s regulated population with confidence that fees appropriately reflect regulatory effort,” it said.
“The superannuation industry is currently facing increased scrutiny, including as a result of the Productivity Commission’s review of efficiency and competitiveness of the superannuation system, and the enhanced disclosure requirements in relation to fees and costs,” the submission said.
“ASFA therefore considers it appropriate that ASIC, and other regulators for the superannuation industry, should be subject to a high degree of scrutiny regarding the levies and fees imposed on the superannuation industry and their utilisation.”
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
