ASIC stands by Responsible Manager process
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has said that claims that it causes serious delays in “stringently reviewing” responsible manager (RM) appointments by Australian Financial Services Licensees (AFSLs) are “plainly wrong”.
The statement came in response to a blog by the Fold Legal, reported on by this publication, writing that the regulator had no legal obligation to approve RMs and was thus causing headaches for AFSLs by going beyond simply receiving notifications of RM appointments.
ASIC executive director, assessment and intelligence, and regional Commissioner, Victoria, Warren Day said that this was untrue.
“To set the record straight, in the past three years, ASIC received 1,806 notifications for a change of RMs (new appointments and cessations) that were subject to Licensing assessment. Of these, 90 per cent were approved in 97 days (in 2016), 79 days (2017) and 60 days (2018). A further five per cent where voluntarily withdrawn, and the remaining five per cent raised regulatory issues that warranted longer assessment timeframes,” Day said.
“There is a legal requirement for licensees who have a ‘key person-responsible manager’ condition on their licence to apply for variation to their licence should that person leave the licensee. And ASIC is required by law to assess that application. In addition, there are other criteria relating to a change of responsible manager that also triggered an assessment.
“Far from being a ‘rubber stamp’, ASIC regards an assessment of such changes as a vital safeguard to ensure that licensees have the competence to meet their licence obligations efficiently, honestly and fairly; and the public can have greater confidence on the quality and standards of those in charge of licensees’ operations. ASIC totally rejects any suggestion of ‘over-stepping’, and the increasingly short time taken to consider and finalise these responsible manager changes fully supports this view.”
Day also said that while the regulator hadn’t put out data publicly on this issue in its yearly licensing reports, it would in the future as the industry clearly found the issue important.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
