ASIC reveals 50% increase in enforcement investigations
The chairman of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), James Shipton has pointed to a 50 per cent increase in enforcement investigations against large financial institutions or their employees as proof that the regulator is “very focused on enforcement and litigation”.
Addressing the Senate Economics Legislation Committee in Canberra late yesterday, Shipton stressed the degree to which ASIC was moving to comply with the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry.
He said that while the impact of what ASIC was doing would only become evident over time, the regulator was already highly active.
“…as an early indication, since 1 February 2018 there has been:
- a 15 per cent increase in the number of ASIC enforcement investigations on foot, and
- a 50 per cent increase in the number of ASIC enforcement investigations of misconduct by large financial institutions (or their employees or subsidiary companies).
Shipton said that he wanted to underscore one broad point to the Senate Committee – “ASIC is very focused on enforcement and litigation”.
“Corporate Australia should know that ASIC has the very clear will to take wrongdoers to court. As the Royal Commission found, that is what Australians expect of their Regulator. And that is what ASIC will deliver,” he said.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
