ASIC prosecutes on best interests duty

8 June 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has targeted a risk-focused advice group for its first-ever action relating to alleged breaches of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) best interest duties requirements.

The regulator announced the move today saying the action had been initiated against Melbourne-based NSG Services Pty Ltd (formerly National Sterling Group Pty Ltd) (NSG).

It said this was the first civil penalty action ASIC had taken against a licensee alleging breaches of the best interests duty and that it was seeking declarations of breaches and financial penalties.

The ASIC announcement said that since 3 April 2008, NSG had been licensed to provide personal advice on risk insurance and superannuation products to retail clients.

The announcement said that ASIC was alleging that NSG failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that its advisers complied with the best interests obligation when providing advice to clients; and that, as a result, on numerous occasions, NSG advisers did not act in the best interests of their clients.

It said that, additionally, it was being alleged that:

  • NSG had not provided appropriate training to its advisers to ensure clients receive advice in their best interests. Instead, ASIC contends that NSG had trained its advisers that it is almost always in a client's best interest to take out some form of life risk insurance, regardless of a client's financial situation;
  • NSG's written policies relating to legal and regulatory compliance and risk management had been inadequate, and in any event, not followed or enforced;
  • since 1 July 2013, on eight specific occasions, and because of advice provided by NSG advisers, clients were sold insurance and/or advised to rollover superannuation accounts that committed them to costly, unsuitable, and unnecessary financial arrangements; and
  • regular and or substantive performance reviews of advisers had not been conducted, and disciplinary action against advisers who did not act in compliance with their obligations under the Corporations Act had not been taken.

The first hearing of the matter is listed before the Federal Court of Australia on 8 July 2016.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND