When indexed IP policy pay-outs exceed actual earnings

1 February 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Many indexed income protection policies are paying out more than people are actually earning and this, in turn, is impacting claims experience, according to a white paper developed by life/risk insurer, ClearView.

The white paper, authored by ClearView’s chief actuary and risk officer, Greg Martin has argued for a fresh approach to income protection portfolios to break what he describes as a worrying pattern of rising claims and then rising premiums.

Martin argues that demand for income protection insurance should be unshakably strong because it protects what is arguably a person’s most valuable asset – their ability to earn money throughout their working life, yet many Australians are more likely to buy insurance to protect their car or pet.

“It’s too simplistic to blame heightened media and regulatory scrutiny of the financial services industry, mounting mental health-related claims and recent price instability for the discontentment of both consumers and insurers,” he argues.

Martin said focusing on these factors alone would not properly address the issue and cited the effects of cyclical trends in underemployment (as opposed to headline unemployment) and slow wages growth as key factors behind the decline of income protection.

He said headlines heralding Australia’s almost 30 years of uninterrupted economic growth and prosperity paint a rosier picture than what the average worker was actually experiencing.

 “Income protection claims follow economic cycles, with poor economic circumstances driving increased claims. The industry’s claims experience reflects the underlying reality rather than the headlines,” Martin said.

 “On top of this, the long period of weak wages growth has resulted in many indexed insured benefit amounts exceeding policyholders’ actual income ratios, meaning the insured benefits are providing increasing income replacement ratios. Higher income replacement ratios also result in higher claims rates so there’s a double impact.”

“Income protection insurance is arguably the most important of all life insurances. No other cover directly provides protection for our most important asset; our future earnings capacity. That’s why the industry must get this right,” Martin said. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND