Insurers feel pressure ahead of new accounting standards

12 September 2018
| By Nicholas Grove |
image
image
expand image

Australian insurers are behind their international counterparts when it comes to being prepared for new major new accounting standards, a survey of 160 global Insurance executives by KPMG International has shown.

The report covered insurers’ preparation for IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) and IFRS 9 (Financial Instruments), two major standards which apply for insurers from 1 January 2021 but for which two years of parallel running are recommended.

The survey showed just 7 per cent of insurers expect to be ready in time for this, and more than half expected just one year of parallel running before going live.

Scott Guse, KPMG Australia Insurance Partner, described IFRS 17 as the most significant accounting change for over 20 years in the life and general sector.

“Ten per cent of the insurers surveyed were Australian and they do seem to be slightly behind their global counterparts when it comes to commencing and implementing their transition to the requirements of the new standard,” he said.

“IFRS 17 brings in different ways of valuing insurance contracts and assets and so will make profit and loss accounts more volatile – this will primarily arise through the ‘choices’ allowed in the new standard when re-measuring claim liabilities.”

The KPMG survey showed major hurdles remain in making IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 operational, with 90 per cent of insurers foreseeing difficulties in securing sufficient skilled people to do the job and half worried about securing the necessary budget.

Guse said that, ironically, the survey also found that organisations which are furthest along with their projects were feeling the greatest time pressure. However, he said there is a positive side.

Despite the challenges ahead, 97 per cent of the largest insurers surveyed viewed implementing the new IFRS standards as an opportunity to transform their business, with a focus on process optimisation, actuarial process enhancement and system modernisation.

“Ultimately, it is critical for insurers to be alert to evolving matters of interpretation so that the impacts on financial statements can be fully understood and there can be a dialogue with investors about what changes they can expect,” Guse said.

“But two years of parallel running is definitely preferable, and not many insurers look like achieving that.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND