ASIC convinces parliamentarians on life/risk advice

13 December 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

A key Parliamentary committee appears to have accepted the explanations of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) with respect to the number of potentially non-compliant financial advisers in the life insurance industry.

The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics dedicated a section of its report emanating out of its Review of the ASIC Annual Report, to the regulator’s assessment of life/risk advice and, in particular, confusion around how many advisers might have been guilty of churn.

In doing so, the committee chairman, David Coleman said it had “noted current public confusion regarding statements made by ASIC in relation to the number of potentially non-compliant financial advisers in the life insurance industry”.

“The committee asked ASIC for clarification of whether it believes 50 financial advisers were at greater risk of having high lapse rates, or whether 50 per cent of advisors were potentially non-compliant,” Coleman said in his report.

He said that ASIC had noted that it was currently collecting data about advisors with high life insurance lapse rates and explained: “As part of the initial data that came through, we identified around 500 advisers with potential issues around higher levels of lapse rates. Of course, there may be quite legitimate reasons why people are being switched or moved between products. We can't go in and undertake high-intensity surveillance of every single one of those. We've narrowed it down to a much smaller pool in the first instance to go and look at and do more in-depth surveillance”

Coleman’s report said that while ASIC remarked that some media articles suggested only those people were possibly causing problems, it added that ‘we are still, unfortunately seeing some problematic advice around life insurance in the surveillances that we undertake’.

“ASIC added that the potential number of non-compliant financial advisers in the life insurance industry is ‘not limited just to that smaller target group that has come up through our first data-gathering exercise.’”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND