Tax efficiency no longer primary driver for offshore investment

24 June 2016
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

Access to greater or better range of investment options has become a primary driver for the high net worth (HNW) offshore investment, rather than the commonly believed tax efficiency, according to Verdict Financial.

The firm's report found that HNW individuals' decisions to invest offshore in 2015 were generally based on a multitude of reasons, which often included geographic and demographic factors, as well as political, economic or monetary conditions in their country of residence.

Verdict Financial's senior analyst, Heike van den Hoevel, noted that due to recent scandals and increased media attention, the word offshore became "overwhelmingly associated with tax avoidance or even evasion".

"Wealth managers need to understand that there is no single reason driving HNW offshore investment, and that providers have to factor in pronounced regional differences when designing their offshore propositions," he said.

"For example, German HNW investors, who traditionally only invest a small proportion abroad, have been increasing their offshore holdings, mainly due to the lack of returns that can be earned at home, while HNW individuals in South Africa have been eager to channel wealth offshore to escape currency volatility in their own country, which suggests that offering hedging tools is essential," he said.

According to Verdict Financial, in 2015, 24.1 per cent of investors using offshore HNW investment to access a greater or better range of investment options.

This was followed by tax efficiency (23.2 per cent) and better investment returns offshore (21.9 per cent).

Other important drivers to look for investment options elsewhere included expectations for the local currency to weaken (10.4 per cent), local politics (7.6 per cent), economic (5.4 per cent), instability as well as client anonymity (3.5 per cent), and the familiarity with a given geography where individuals used to live (1.8 per cent).

"Verdict Financial believes that local wealth managers would do well to offer a wider range of investment funds providing exposure to international markets to avoid losing funds to offshore providers. On the flipside, providers looking to attract offshore wealth should highlight more beneficial investment conditions in their country," van den Hoevel stressed.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND