Scientific Beta warns of factor-investing risks

6 March 2019
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

A Scientific Beta study has highlighted the risks of deviating from academically validated factors and the limitations of many popular factor-investing solutions.

A new study, “The Risks of Deviating from academically Validated factors”, has found the following dangers of not adhering to academic consensus when it came to factor investing:

  • Factors used in investment practice showed a stark mismatch with factors that documented by financial economists;
  • Commercial factors were based on complex composite definitions that offer maximum flexibility. Providers used this flexibility to seek out the factors with the highest performance in a given dataset; and
  • Such practice allowed spurious factors to be found.

This type of practice led to the presentation of in-sample performances that have very little chance of being reproduced out of sample., the firm said.

Commenting on the study, Professor Noël Amenc, chief executive of Scientific Beta, said: “Understanding the factor drivers of returns increases transparency and allows investors to formulate more explicit investment choices.

“However, being aware of exposures to useless factors, which have no reliable link with long-term returns, is pointless.

“For a meaningful contribution to the ability of investors to make explicit investment choices, factor investing should focus on persistent and externally validated factors. It is time to recall the good idea of factor investing.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND