One-in-five Australians say their adviser does not offer ESG

18 November 2021
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

About one in five Australian individual investors say their financial adviser does not offer environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment options while about the same amount said it would sacrifice their returns, according to research.

The global research from Natixis Investment Managers, which surveyed 8,550 individual investors across 24 countries, 400 of which were from Australia, showed about seven-in-10 Australian Investors were not able to access ESG investment options from their adviser.

About the same number of Australians also said fund managers should be actively engaging with companies they invested in and voting on all shares they owned.

Louise Watson, country head of Natixis Investment Managers Australia and New Zealand, said individual investors were increasingly believing ESG investment decision making should involve financial advisers, fund managers and investors themselves.

“Specifically, from Australian respondents, we heard that there is an expectation for fund managers to vote on all the shares they own and employ active engagement with companies they invest in,” Watson said.

“This is another example of how mainstream ESG has become in investing, and its potential for becoming among the most critical decision points for investments, especially when it comes to ensuring the interests of our clients here.”

Globally, about six-in-10 global investors rejected the idea that companies were only responsible for creating value for their shareholders. And about seven-in-10 investors would be more inclined to invest in funds that demonstrated a better carbon footprint.

According to the research, North America now led the world in ESG adoption and it was no longer a phenomenon driven primarily by millennials, women, wealthy and European investors, as it had become more mainstream.

Following the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26), 82% of investors believed companies had a responsibility to address social issues, 4% more than the belief that governments should.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

5 days 21 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

5 days 22 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

6 days 21 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND