Are bank cross-subsidies anti-competitive?
What is the difference between the major banks and the way they fund dealer group services and the manner in which Coles and Woolworths subsidise petrol station discounts?
The answer is very little, according to Premium Wealth Management chief executive Paul Harding-Davis, who said today he was surprised that no one had thought to raise the issue with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
Referencing the manner in which the competition watchdog had examined how the two major supermarket chains, Coles and Woolworths, had used grocery sales to deliver discounts at the petrol bowser, Harding-Davis said he believed a number of the major banks were using similar strategies to deliver lower-priced dealer group services.
"Anyone who looks at the two regimes might conclude that parallels exist between supermarkets using grocery sales to subsidise petrol operations and financial services companies who use revenues from product sales to subsidise dealer-group services," he said.
Harding-Davis said that such practices made it very difficult for non-aligned dealer groups to compete on cost.
Recommended for you
The Federal Court has issued its verdict in ASIC's first greenwashing case against Vanguard Investments Australia regarding the use of ESG exclusionary screens.
Investment managers who plan to implement artificial intelligence in the next five years expect to see increased productivity, but views are mixed on whether it will boost revenue and assets under management.
A former corporate adviser has been sentenced in the Supreme Court of Western Australia for insider trading to realise a profit of more than $57,000.
Private markets expertise is sought-after for investment operations hires as allocations to alternative assets rise, according to a recruitment firm, but there is a gap between demand and supply.