TPB adding to adviser woes says AFA

26 June 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The financial advice sector would be being singled out for different treatment to other professional sectors if the Tax Practitioners Board (TPB) moved to force specific client approval for tax advisers to move them to a new adviser.

That was the assessment of the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) in a submission responding to a TPB practice note dealing with proposed changes covering the transfer of business including a letter of engagement.

“We are not aware of any other profession (doctors, lawyers, accountants, dentists, physiotherapists, chiropractors etc) that requires positive client consent as part of the sale or transfer of a business,” the AFA submission said. “Moving to a model of positive and specific consent from each client would have a very material impact upon the financial advice profession and put at risk the clients of financial advisers.”

The AFA also pointed out that the TPB’s proposal was being put forward at the same time as a large number of financial advisers were being forced to change licensees and when a substantial number were considering their intention to remain in the financial advice profession.

The AFA submission said that the proposal from the TPB along with the Letter of Engagement proposal was likely to have a further material negative impact upon the viability of the financial advice sector.

“It will also likely serve as an additional impost on clients who are already required to complete a raft of declarations and red tape, and possibly discourage them from continuing their advice relationship,” it said.

“To put it plainly, there are many financial advisers across Australia who are currently struggling and in elevated states of distress and anxiety. This proposal, and the likely consequences in terms of the valuation of financial advice businesses will add to the mental health issues that are now impacting the financial advice profession,” the AFA submission said.

“In our view, what has been proposed is excessive and is being proposed at the worst possible time for the financial advice sector.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND