Restrictions for licensees in intermediary authorisation agreements

1 July 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Australian financial services (AFS) licensees with an agreement with an unlicensed product provider cannot deal in a financial product unless they are issuing, varying, or disposing for the product issuer, according to The Fold Legal.

In an analysis the firm’s solicitor director, Jamie Lumsden, said such an agreement would give an “intermediary authorisation” for a product issuer to provide products to retail clients without an AFS licence.

However, under the intermediary authorisation a product issuer cannot deal directly with customers under any circumstance, Lumsden said.

The analysis said: “The AFS licensee cannot deal in a financial product unless they’re issuing, varying or disposing for the product issuer. This means you can’t:

  • Make a market for the financial product;
  • Operate a registered scheme;
  • Provide a custodial or depository service; or
  • Provide a crowd-funding service.

This means the exemption can never be used by:

  • The trustee of a registered scheme (including peer-to-peer lenders);
  • The trustee of an unregistered scheme that has the custodial and depository services authorisation. In this arrangement, the only option available to the trustee is to hold its own AFS licence. But it can be used by the trustee of an unregistered scheme that does not hold any financial products in custody, like a property scheme which only holds real property, provided the trustee only deals with investors through the licensee; and
  • Non-cash payment providers that allow direct access to their services”.

Lumsden noted the agreement would only be valid if the arrangement included a written agreement that:

  • Authorises the AFS licensee to make offers to arrange for the product issuer to issue, vary or dispose of the financial products;
  • Specifies that the product issuer will actually issue, vary or dispose of the products in accordance with any offers made by the licensee; and
  • Only involves offers made by the licensee that are covered by the authorisations on that licensee’s AFS licence.

Such arrangements could be used by insurers who entered the Australian market by granting a binding authority to an agent or non-cash payment products as long as customers did not have direct access to their services.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 18 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 19 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 18 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND