Make insurer claims-handling performance public, says AFA

13 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has been told that making public the claims-handling performance of individual life insurance companies would make it easier for financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients.

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has told APRA that failure to make such information available on an individual insurer basis would represent a lost opportunity.

The AFA said it believed making the individual insurance company claims information public would be beneficial at two levels.

“The first level is that this information is useful for financial advisers who provide advice to clients with respect to insurance cover,” it said. “We also believe that there is a public benefit in understanding the claims payment information and ratios of different providers of life insurance products.”

In doing so, the AFA said that it accepted that there could be detriment to the commercial interests of particular insurers who performed poorly in the reported results.

“However, the reporting of this information is in the public interest and will most likely have a positive competitive influence on the overall insurance market,” the AFA said. “We do not support the non-disclosure of information simply on the grounds that poor relative results might have a detrimental impact upon the commercial interests of the insurer.”

The AFA also pointed out that it would be very difficult for the general public to make sense of the information because of the volume across different products, channels and life insurers.

“There is a risk that this information will be misunderstood and even misreported,” it said. “We believe that the agencies need to be aware of this risk and to take appropriate action if required, including if it is misreported.”

The AFA suggested that a simplified version could be made available for the general public.

“We also believe that this information would be useful for the public to understand the differences between insurance acquired through financial advisers versus Direct or via Group Superannuation,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND