How the cost of an SOA rose 10% inside 12 months

28 February 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The average cost of providing a statement of advice (SoA) for new clients rose 10% between 2018 and 2019 in what was a reflection of the increasing challenge of compliance costs.

That is one of the bottom lines of an industry assessment undertaken by Financial Planning Association (FPA) chief executive, Dante De Gori in a column to be published in an upcoming edition of Money Management.

According to De Gori, the FPA’s members have been telling the organisation that the cost of providing advice has never been as high as it is today.

“Costs could increase further as financial planners adjust to increased surveillance and enforcement activities the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is undertaking following the Financial Services Royal Commission,” he wrote.

“Our most recent member survey shows the major challenge for planners over the next three years will be the cost of regulation, with almost half (48.3%) of FPA members agreeing on this, up from 33.5% in 2018. In 2019, 41.4% of our members said reducing the cost of providing advice would be a major challenge, up significantly from 25.3% in 2018.”

“On average, FPA members charge $2,671 to prepare a SOA for new clients, up almost 10% from $2,435 in 2018,” De Gori wrote.

“We believe the current framework needs to be re-examined to ensure financial planners can continue to meet compliance requirements while also meeting the growing demand for financial advice from consumers. It would be a sad day if Australians were regulated out of their chance to receive quality advice.”

Elsewhere in his column, De Gori acknowledges the role of intra-fund advice in helping keeping down the cost of advice.

“New innovations and technologies are rapidly being adopted at a practice level by financial planners across Australia to streamline efficiencies within their businesses and reduce compliance costs,” he wrote. “Meanwhile, many superannuation funds now offer advice to their members and are integrating digital-advice offerings along with intra-fund to help Australians who may not be able to afford full-scale financial planning.”

“It is important to recognise the depth and breadth of the advice profession, one where industry participants offer different levels of service depending on the needs of their clients. A full-scale financial plan may not be affordable for some, but there are other options available and lower cost is not synonymous with poorer quality – this has been widely misunderstood by many commentators, to the detriment of the unadvised majority of Australians.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 19 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 20 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 19 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND