FSC back once-off MySuper advice

5 March 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has told the Government it should allow members of MySuper products to obtain financial advice in the form of one-off advice with no ongoing fees.

In a submission filed with the Treasury, the FSC has stopped short of the position adopted by the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) which have argued for advice within MySuper and instead suggested the one-off advice arrangement.

In doing so, the FSC said that banning all advice fees from MySuper was only justifiable under two incorrect assumptions:

  • Advice about superannuation only includes advice about specific investments and is therefore not required by MySuper members; and
  • All MySuper members are disengaged, and they do not seek advice.

However, it claimed that, in reality:

  • Many people have actively chosen a MySuper product, potentially via recommendation from their adviser;
  • Many default members later become engaged in their superannuation (for example as they approach retirement) and seek advice about their savings; and
  • Significant protections are already in place to ensure advice is provided appropriately.

The FSC submission said that for members undergoing (or planning for) significant life changes such as a family separation or retirement, there was a significant need for members who may previously have been disengaged to seek financial advice.

In explaining the organisation’s position, the FSC submission said that there was a danger that totally banning advice within MySuper would significantly worsen outcomes for many superannuation fund members.

“This is because the change will create a two-tiered system that charges out-of-pocket advice fees to some members, but not others. The members most affected by this change would be those who are least able to afford these costs,” it said.

“It is inevitable that fewer people will receive financial advice as a result of this change, as some people would simply walk away when they were unable to meet the full cost. This could materially impact the decisions they make in relation to their retirement savings, and in some cases substantially reduce their savings at retirement.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 12 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 13 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND