Financial services professionalism not advanced at all

28 November 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Organisations such as the Financial Planning Association (FPA) may have committed to achieving professional status, but the broader Australian financial services industry is falling a long way short of the mark.

That is the assessment of the Professional Standards Council expressed in a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee Inquiry on Corporations and Financial Services which has revealed that it undertook a research project into the professionalisation of financial services and found the results to be “concerning”.

Further, the research findings suggested professionalism was unlikely to succeed without substantial Government intervention.

It said that it had entered into the research project assuming that a coordinated strategy for Financial Services professionalisation might already be underway in response to the frequency of public inquiries and the call to action from the community and media.

However the submission said it was clear from the research that while steps had been taken and that some communities had invested heavily in the process of advancing professionalisation and others intended to expand their existing professional systems, “it is also clear that his is limited to a few communities within the ecosystem of Financial Services”.

It said that professionalisation (in the larger construct of standards and regulation oriented to consumer protection and higher duty) “has not been defined or universally committed to by the whole industry”.

The submission said the results were surprising in that they revealed the project to professionalise the financial services was:

•          Less progressed than was expected

•          Hampered by a lack of unified understanding of professional standards and regulation

•          Hampered by Association cost concerns and distorting competition pressures that discourages leadership in self-regulatory action

•          Hampered by resistance to community engagement and a reactive approach to regulatory engagement that has a distorting and negative affect on pursuit of collaborative solutions.

•          Unlikely to succeed without substantial government intervention and a sponsored strategy for professionalisation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND