Expect slowdown in regulatory change in 2022

25 November 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

With a Federal Election and multiple reviews in the industry that will be underway, 2022 will be a quiet year when it comes to regulatory change, according to the Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA).

Ben Marshan, FPA head of policy, strategy and innovation, said things were already locked in from a regulatory change perspective.

Next year, Treasury would have its review into advice, which included the Life Insurance Framework review, and the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) would have its review of the Corporations Act.

“We’re not going to see a lot of regulatory change in 2022 because we have the reviews on, and we also have an election coming up, so 2022 is going to be fairly settled from a regulatory change perspective,” Marshan said.

“It gives us an opportunity to settle in, but we’ll get to the end of 2022 and we’re going to have more reports coming in which are going to say these are the improvements that need to be made around the regulation of financial advice to make it more accessible to consumers [and to] make sure it can be provided efficiently and affordably, but we won’t see any of that next year.

“It’s a massive opportunity in 2022 to look at your business, look at your processes, look at your clients and just settle things down and re-engineer the business the way that you need to make it work.”

With a Federal Election due, the country was most likely to see more consumer-focused issues for financial services, similar to the 2019 election which followed the conclusion of the Royal Commission.

“We’re going to see the election fought on consumer issues, so there are likely to be policy positions that the two main parties will take in relation to superannuation, taxation, property investments and things like that,” Marshan said.

“From that perspective, the focus is terms of the election and probably the budget and the outcome of the election is going to be focus on the advice we provide, not the way we provide advice.

“[This] is kind of where the last election was more fought in terms of the Royal Commission and implementing the Royal Commission [recommendations] because that was about how advice was provided, not how to fix clients.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 7 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 8 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND