Education would boost trust and lower costs

13 January 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

While experienced financial planners may be exempt from educational requirements in the future, it is still a worthwhile study as a minimum standard can help build client trust.

It was proposed last year that advisers who had worked in the industry for 10 years would only have to complete an ethics bridging course instead of the full educational requirements.

Speaking to Money Management, Michael Miller, financial planner at Capital Advisory, who had more than 10 years of experience, disagreed with the plans.

Research by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission had found there was low trust in financial planning profession, which he felt was exacerbated by the lack of educational standard.

People felt more comfortable and trusting, he said, if they knew an adviser had met certain educational requirements.

“There is that hurdle to overcome before people feel comfortable with you and that takes time and increases the cost of providing advice. If people have that evidence that a minimum standard has been reached from the beginning, that removes the barrier and helps to build rapport with the client.”

In a written submission to Treasury, he added: “I support having an education standard that requires a portion of formal study for existing financial planners as well as new, so that consumers can reasonably expect any financial planner licensed in Australia has undertaken a reasonable standard of formal education. I support this standard as a reasonable effort on behalf of experienced financial planners, for the benefit of consumers and the profession”.

However, Miller welcomed modifications to the educational pathways to broaden the range of subjects related to financial planning.

This was expected to benefit those professions where financial planning was not the main task such as stockbrokers and insurers. These sectors had already raised doubts about the relevance of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) to their work.

“What is being proposed is that people can still meet the educational qualifications by studying related areas such as commerce or business. This is less prescriptive now and these areas are more relevant to their jobs and something they may want to study or to expand their skills.

“Before, people were willing to do the study but they didn’t necessarily feel it was relevant or broadening their knowledge.”

Miller encouraged other planners to make their own submission to Treasury, even if they already passed the FASEA requirements. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND