Counting the cost of compliance

30 November 2007
| By Sara Rich |
image
image
expand image

Vanessa McMahon

A new study has revealed that each week financial advisers are losing a day’s worth of valuable face-to-face time with clients to compliance.

The Wealth Insights survey of more than 890 advisers found, on average, that advisers spend 18 per cent of their time on compliance, which does not include plan preparation, plan implementation and other administration.

It is of little surprise then that 74 per cent of advisers cite compliance as their biggest concern, followed by a related worry of not having enough time to provide quality service and advice to clients.

The study showed that only 35 per cent of an adviser’s time is spent meeting with clients or reviewing client portfolios.

Wealth Insights managing director Vanessa McMahon said the level of frustration advisers experienced under the current regime remained unchanged from when Financial Services Reform was first introduced.

“Their frustrations are compounded because of a lack of clarity around black letter law interpretations, and the intent of the law has not yet been achieved,” she said.

“Advisers’ frustrations are compounded when there isn’t anything really definitive that explains exactly what they have to do to be in full compliance of the law.”

The survey’s revelations highlight the importance of the work conducted by the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) and the Financial Planning Association (FPA) in lobbying the Government to cut red tape.

According to IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert, Australian financial services compliance costs as much as 10 to 15 per cent of total operating costs.

Earlier this month, FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said by cutting the red tape surrounding an adviser’s disclosure and compliance obligations, financial advice would become more accessible and affordable for Australians.

She said that rather than seeking a total overhaul of the Financial Services Reform regime, the FPA was calling for policy changes, such as definition updates to the terms ‘general’ and ‘personal’ advice within Corporations Law.

The FPA would also like to see the removal of the current criminal sanctions on financial planners for failing to provide clients with a Statement of Advice or Financial Services Guide within five days of giving advice.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND