Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

ASIC's Peter Kell outlines code of conduct requirements

peter-kell/ASIC/financial-advice-industry/financial-services-council/FOFA/association-of-financial-advisers/corporations-act/financial-advisers/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/AFA/FSC/

1 May 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Compliant industry codes of conduct deemed to obviate the need to comply with opt-in requirements will have to meet a hefty set of criteria, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) commissioner Peter Kell.

Speaking at a Financial Services Council (FSC) and Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) post-FOFA breakfast this morning, Kell said he expected multiple codes to be submitted and it was not ASIC's place to take a view on who should be able to submit a code, although he expected submitters to be representative bodies of the financial advice industry.

Codes will need to comply with the Corporations Act, will need to be reviewed regularly, and provide guidelines to members over and above what is contained in the legislation.

They need to be free-standing documents written in plain English and need to be enforceable on members, Kell said.

They will need to be independently administered with ongoing review, and member compliance with the codes to be monitored and enforced with appropriate sanctions, he said.

"We expect the code to address issues not contained within the legislation, and clearly explain to members what needs to be done to comply with legislation," he said. "In other words - they must be taken seriously," he said. 

Kell expected the codes would take time to develop and ASIC would take weeks or months to assess each one. 

Responding to a question from the audience, Kell said it was unlikely that industry codes of conduct would be required to incorporate a ban on asset-based fees on non-geared investments.

ASIC does not wish to see codes put forward without adequate input from stakeholders.Codes should address other aspects of FOFA besides opt-in, he added.

To obviate the need for opt-in codes should require an obligation to clients that will achieve the same results as opt-in, including that clients are not paying for advice they do not receive, he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 3 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND