ASIC cracks down on licensee ‘independence’

2 March 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has continued its crackdown on financial services licensees using the term ‘independent', with three firms taking steps to remove the term following concerns raised by the corporate regulator.

Authorised representative of Suncorp Financial Services, Citywide Insurance Brokers and Financial Planners Pty Ltd, as well as Wilson HTM, and iSelect Life Pty Ltd have removed or amended claims about the independence of their services.

The crackdown is part of a surveillance project initiated by ASIC in 2012, where it found 21 insurance brokers and financial planners who claimed their licensee, or services provided, were independent were actually in breach of the Corporations Act.

Under the Corporations Act, financial services firms or a person providing financial services cannot claim to be independent if they receive commissions, volume-based payments or other gifts or benefits, and operates without any conflicts of interest.

Citywide's licensee, Suncorp, sets adviser sales and retention targets in exchange for commercial benefits such as exclusive client services rights. Citywide used the term ‘independent' on its website to describe its advisers.

Wilson and iSelect accept volume-based payments and commissions from product issuers for financial services and advice, but Wilson used the term independent on its website and in a brochure distributed to consumers.

iSelect used the term in three marketing e-mails that were sent out to consumers.

Wilson and Citywide have removed the term ‘independent' from their websites and Wilson and iSelect has removed it from their marketing material. All three firms said they would review their marketing approval processes.

ASIC deputy chair, Peter Kell, said: "Consumers must not be misled into believing that an adviser is independent and free from influence by commissions or other benefits or associations, when that is not the case".

The Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms banned many types of conflicted remuneration, but some commissions and volume-based payments are exempt or grandfathered.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Graeme

FWIW I am a long term holder of both. I am relaxed about my LICs trading at a discount. Part of a cycle. I would like...

4 hours 26 minutes ago
Ross Smith

The term "The democratisation of private assets continues to gain steam" is marketing misleading. There is no democracy...

6 hours 11 minutes ago
Greg

I have passed this exam, and it is not easy or fair exam. It's no wonder that advisers are falsifying their results. ...

3 days 6 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND