ASFA concerned about director remuneration models
The remuneration of superannuation fund directors should be publicly disclosed, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
In its submission to a discussion paper released by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), ASFA noted this requirement should not focus on the person's total remuneration, but rather on the component which pays them for carrying out their duties as a trustee director.
In September 2011, APRA proposed a requirement for all Responsible Superannuation Entity (RSE) licensees to establish and maintain a Board Remuneration Committee, which would put in place a remuneration policy.
This Board would help trustee directors avoid conflicts of interests and so-called misalignments of duties.
"Our concern is that, unless directors of trustee boards are remunerated for being a trustee, then where they are appointed by virtue of a relationship between their employer and the RSE licensee, they will have conflicting priorities and will not be in a position to act with the required independence of mind," ASFA stated.
ASFA said an effective remuneration policy should free up directors to maintain the necessary independence of mind when acting as the trustee in order to regard the best interests of members of the fund concerned.
Recommended for you
Unregistered managed investment scheme operator Chris Marco has been sentenced after being found guilty of 43 fraud charges, receiving the highest sentence imposed by an Australian court regarding an ASIC criminal investigation.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of Sydney-based Arrumar Private after it failed to comply with the conditions of its licence.
Two investment advisory research houses have announced a merger to form a combined entity under the name Delta Portfolios.
The top five licensees are demonstrating a “strong recovery” from losses in the first half of the year, and the gap is narrowing between their respective adviser numbers.
