Annuities drive strong Challenger result
Challenger Limited ended the financial year in good shape, posting a seven per cent increase in normalised net profit after tax of $248 million on the back of strong product sales and cash earnings.
The company said increased advertising, marketing and distribution activity and an outlook for ongoing equity market volatility had helped drive organic retail sales of annuity products up by 56 per cent to $1.46 billion.
As well, Challenger chief executive, Dominic Stevens said in the company's announcement to the Australian Securities Exchange he believed there was considerable scope for further growth in annuity sales.
"While Challenger's annuity sales have already grown by an annual compound rate of 33 per cent since 2006, we believe we're still in the early stages of a fundamental change in the Australian retirement savings market," he said.
Stevens said to match expected demand the company had grown its distribution team targeting 25 per cent retail annuity growth, 10 per cent retail book growth and a record $430 million in cash earnings for the life company.
"In the medium term we believe this growth rate is sustainable because baby boomers controlling 60 per cent of the assets in our trillion dollar super system are beginning to retire," he said.
Challenger rewarded investors with a final dividend of 9.5 cents, with the full-year dividend up 14 per cent to 16.5 cents.
Recommended for you
Adviser Ratings has explored whether there is a financial benefit to advice firms seeking to have a specialised client base in terms of client assets and fees charged.
Research by two recruiters has revealed whether salary or team culture is more important to financial services professionals when considering a new position.
Two financial advice businesses are to merge in a bid to create a multidisciplinary professional services firm as part of AZ NGA’s “super firm” strategy.
While the Financial Services and Credit Panel can take action on individual advisers’ misconduct, a compliance professional unpacks why the panel does not always subject licensees to further action.