AFCA consults on proposed funding model

10 March 2022
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is consulting on a proposed user-pays funding model for complaints in which 98% of investment and advice members will only pay the annual registration fee of $376.

AFCA said the model would reduce the burden on small members like financial planning firms and brokers, as well as other less frequent users of the scheme, through its user-pays approach and the buffer of five free complaints.

AFCA chief operating officer, Justin Untersteiner, said the model would minimise the cross-subsidisation across sectors that had been occurring under the interim model put in place at AFCA’s inception in 2018.

He said this was because it considered both the volume of complaints registered for a firm along with the time taken to resolve those complaints.

“Our user-pays approach incentivises firms to use internal dispute resolution to decrease complaints to AFCA. Firms can absolutely significantly reduce their fees and charges through improvements to their own processes and procedures,” Untersteiner said.

Under the proposed model, most of the 3000 approximate investment and advice members (94%) would either experience reduced or the same total annual fees, with only 6% seeing an increase (largely due to their higher relative complaint volumes).

The complaints authority currently had many investment and advice members who did not hold a licence but were registered as a credit representative. The vast majority of credit representatives would pay only $66 a year under the proposed model.

AFCA chief ombudsman and chief executive, David Locke, told members: “It’s a fair, transparent and equitable model that is supported by strong data and modelling.

“We have listened to what you have told us over the past few years and this has been used to design a model that rewards good performance and early resolution, and apportions fees fairly based on use of AFCA’s services.”

Under the user-pays model, firms would have control over the fees they paid by managing their complaints well, he said.

The proposed funding model included a single registration fee, a simplified complaints fee structure and introduced five free complaints per year to all members. It removed the superannuation levy and would bring superannuation funds under the same fee structure as other AFCA members – with a positive or neutral impact for most superannuation members.

Under the proposed model, 66% of fees would be recovered from the 2.5% of AFCA’s members that represent 66% of all complaints received by AFCA.

About 90% of AFCA members, covering banking, insurance, superannuation, investment, and advice, would see a positive or neutral impact on total cost with one in five experiencing a decrease in fees.

Overall, 95% of licensed financial firm members of the AFCA external dispute resolution scheme would pay only their annual registration fee each year, currently estimated to be $376 for the coming financial year. Among authorised credit representatives, 99.9% would pay only $65.98 annually – steady with their annual membership levy.

The proposed user-pays model emerged from a study of AFCA’s funding by PwC Australia that incorporated feedback from members, including submissions made to last year’s Treasury-led Independent Review of AFCA.

AFCA had been seeking feedback on the proposed model from firms and industry groups in recent weeks and had held the first of five member webinars this week.

AFCA would be taking feedback from members during a six-week consultation period that was expected to end on 22 April. The model would then be put to AFCA’s independent board in May, for a decision. Any changes would take effect from 1 July, 2022.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 10 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 11 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND