Advisers get role in personalised CIPRs

18 May 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government has released the consultation documents around its so-called retirement income covenant, making clear that the resultant comprehensive income products in retirement (CIPRs) will need to last the full lifetime of a fund member and that a simple account-based pension (ABP) will not be acceptable.

Importantly, however, superannuation funds will be able to outsource the development and delivery of CIPRs to third parties and the Government has provided scope to move beyond a one-size-fits-all product to the development of tailored CIPRs via the provision of personal financial advice and member best interests.

The position paper was released by the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer who made clear that superannuation funds would be required to help their members meet their retirement income objectives.

"For too long superannuation has been focused only on accumulating savings,” she said. “A retirement income framework is a pivotal part of the Government's reform agenda for superannuation – an agenda squarely focused on protecting and improving outcomes for superannuation members."

O’Dwyer said the new covenant would form the cornerstone of the new framework and would be added to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993, elevating consideration of members' retirement income needs to sit alongside the other fundamental obligations of trustees, such as the investment, risk management and insurance needs.

The Treasury position paper has given stakeholders until 15 June to respond but one of its key elements is its provision of a definition for a CIPR, including that it should provide income for life, rather than only to life expectancy.

It said that superannuation funds would need to ensure that CIPRs were designed in such a way that even if the member lived to 105, they would continue to receive broadly the same level of income from the product.

Further it said that a 100 per cent allocation to an ABP alone would not meet the definition of a CIPR.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND