Advice technology solutions work in silos

15 June 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Financial advisers are bombarded with an excess of choices when it comes to technology while many of the software solutions in the market work in silos and do not talk to each other.

That was the view of technology and advice solutions provider, YTML, whose director, Terri Ho, told a media roundtable yesterday that it was not a case of advisers and planners being reluctant to embrace technology but that they did not know how to combine the different components together.

Citing planning and accounting software solutions as an example, Ho said both sets of software required client information to be entered separately and manually, meaning planners and accountants were performing repetitive tasks.

“They find that, ‘okay, when I do my financial planning advice and I do my file notes, which system do I put it on? Do I put it on my financial planning software, or do I put it on my accounting software? Because then I’ve got two records that don’t talk’,” Ho said.

William Buck director, wealth advisory, Adrian Frinsdorf voiced similar concerns earlier this year, stating that while there were technology providers out there who had claimed to have designed software to fill this void, none of the software solutions had actually solved the issue.

Other technological elements in an advice practice might include implementing a service like Suitebox to enable electronic signatures from clients for remote access, software to enter commissions earned, or a software to compare insurance quotes.

“We find that there are a lot of practices that just put up with, ‘oh you go and enter the client data here, but then you’ve got to enter the same client data on to this software in order to generate this report and the piece all the reports together manually,” Ho said.

Principal consultant, Damian Murphy said the advice community was sometimes seeking a silver bullet technology solution without understanding what their precise needs were.

“When we are engaging with any business no matter what the size, we stress how important it is to spend the time diagnosing the issue so that consulting part of our business is just critical,” Murphy said.

“But if you try to jump ahead to the technology piece or the solution piece, which a lot of these advisers do, then they’re just creating a problem for the future.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND