Is advice really advice without a product recommendation?

7 March 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

A near two decade-old legislative drafting decision needs to be corrected before product can be properly and permanently separated from advice, according to former dealer group chief executive and current adviser group board member, Paul Harding-Davis.

Harding-Davis, who was part of the industry response to the Financial Services Reform Act process said that the problem lies in the fact that, at law, there is no financial advice unless it relates to the recommendation/sale of a product,

“To put in bluntly - there is no such thing at law as financial advice unless there is a recommendation (sale) of a product,” he said. “It’s been around for so long that few people seem to understand what is ‘advice’ in terms of the Corporations Act.”

Harding-Davis cited RG 36.19 which defined financial product advice as:

“A recommendation or a statement of opinion, or a report of either of those things, constitutes financial product advice under s766B if:

  1. it is intended to influence a person or persons in making a decision about a particular financial product or class of financial products, or an interest in a particular financial product or class of financial products, or could reasonably be regarded as being intended to have such an influence;”

“Advice, as is clear, is actually defined as Financial Product Advice, and requires the recommendation (selling?) of a financial product,” he said. “As an aside, it is worth noting that this only relates to financial products.  A Gold Ingot, or a specific residential property come under the Real Assets definition and are not covered by this definition.”

“Given that the product recommendation is usually the least value add of the whole 12-13 step financial advice process, it is arguable that the most valuable parts of financial advice do not even require authorisation or registration,” Harding-Davis said.

He said that rather than commentators and others being surprised that advice is intertwined with a product, they should be shocked when it is not given the law.

Harding-Davis said that, in these circumstances, he believed it would be difficult to fix the underlying problems with advice without actually fixing the underlying regulations.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND