Why are advisers paying more for the same exam?

1 October 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

With the amount of compliance the corporate watchdog has piled onto the financial advice industry in a bid to increase transparency and standards, it would be wise for the regulator to also walk the talk on disclosure.

This is especially given that the draft regulations of the Better Advice Bill revealed that once the financial adviser exam is moved from the Financial Adviser Standards and

Ethics Authority (FASEA) to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the fee to sit the exam will increase by almost 60%.

Next year, the financial adviser exam fee will rise by $354 to $948 and ASIC needs to explain why. 

The reason they need to explain is the fact that the regulator had exponentially increased the ASIC levy over three years, before the Government decided to restore the levy to the 2019 level, for the reason that there were less advisers and that most advisers were not associated with the litigation the levy funded.

Many of the advisers who have left the industry have done so due to the amount of red tape the regulator has introduced.

Not only this, ASIC representatives recently told a Parliamentary committee that they “deeply cared” about the costs being borne by financial advisers but now have increased the fee for advisers to sit the compulsory exam.

Another reason the regulator should be explaining how they worked out the fee is because the cost to remark non-multiple choice answers has remained the same at $218.

Advisers that continue to be “existing” on the Financial Adviser Register but not a “relevant provider” and intend on sitting the exam next year may need to rethink their strategy as the booking period for the last exam of 2021 closes at the end of October. 

However, the draft regulations did include some sensible changes such as the removal of the three month waiting period before a person could resit an exam as well as the addition of more flexibility around how a person chooses to sit the exam.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 1 hour ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 2 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 1 hour ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND