ASIC commences insider trading civil proceedings against Westpac

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced civil proceedings against Westpac for insider trading, unconscionable conduct and breaches of its Australian financial services licensee (AFSL) obligations, related to the bank’s role in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction with AustralianSuper and a group of IFM entities.

The transaction occurred on 20 October, 2016, and was associated with the privatisation of a majority stake in the electricity provider Ausgrid by the NSW Government and was the largest rate swap transaction executed in one tranche in Australian financial market history.

At about 7am on 20 October, the consortium signed an agreement with the NSW Government for the acquisition of Ausgrid.

Related News:

ASIC alleged that by about 8:30am on 20 October 2016, Westpac knew, or believed, it would be selected by the consortium to execute the interest rate swap transaction on that morning.

The corporate regulator alleged this was inside information and when the market opened at 8:30am, whilst in possession of the alleged inside information, Westpac’s traders acquired and disposed of interest rate derivative products in order to pre-position Westpac in anticipation of the execution of the swap transaction.

ASIC alleged that Westpac’s trading occurred while it was in possession of information that was not generally available to other market participants including those that traded with Westpac that morning.

The consortium, via a special purpose vehicle, executed the interest rate swap transaction with Westpac at 10:27am.

ASIC alleged that Westpac’s trading on the morning of 20 October had the potential to impact the price of the swap transaction to the detriment of the consortium or the special purpose vehicle.

In addition to the insider trading allegation, ASIC also alleged the circumstances surrounding Westpac’s trading on the morning of 20 October, which included its failure to provide to the consortium full and informed disclosure about its intention to pre-position its trading books prior to and with notice of the execution of the swap transaction, amounted to unconscionable conduct.

ASIC sought declarations and pecuniary penalties for Westpac’s alleged contraventions s1043A of the Corporations Act and s12CB of the ASIC Act, a declaration for Westpac’s alleged contravention of s912A of the Corporations Act, and ancillary orders.

In a statement to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), Westpac acknowledged the proceedings and said it would not comment further as it was now a matter before court.

Recommended for you




Its not a crime if a banker commits fraud.

So all the energy they spent on going after their ex-advisers and threatening to take their homes under their bizarre and discredited internal "lookback" was maybe all just a smokescreen to cover their own misdeeds?

no duke that was another red herring ASIC sent every major bank on after the RC...they were all put on notice and given stern instructions to respond or face EU conditions on their license which was viewed as highly unpalatable....but it does show you that where the adviser industry as a whole has suffered from it, the bad practices, and behaviour were predominant within advice in the banks and thats never fully been acknowledged...take the ASIC levy as an example of "all pay for the sins of the few"

Looks like Westpac cost Industry Super some money - and ASIC is not happy? Revenge time. This could be interesting.

Add new comment