FASEA sees adviser sentiment plummet

With the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority’s (FASEA’s) changes to professional standards still up in the air, the uncertainty of the future of the financial services industry has adviser sentiment unsurprisingly low.

Speaking to Money Management, the Association of Financial Advisers’ general manager of policy and professionalism, Phil Anderson, said the FASEA changes were the biggest issue facing adviser this year, and the continuing uncertainty and fear about how vigorous the potential requirements would be has advisers feeling blue.

Anderson said while advisers were dealing with the situation differently, they were all wondering whether they were fairly recognised for their previous work or whether there would be equity in the new model.

Related News:

“The older advisers are confronting this differently again,” said Anderson. “It’s, ‘am I going to get the value out of doing it?’ or, ‘I haven’t done this for a very long period of time, am I going to be able to do it’,” he said.

Anderson said the exam component in particular is causing a lot of anxiety, as a lot of existing advisers have not been in an exam-like situation for years.

Findex’s managing partner of financial advisers, Matt Swieconek, said advisers are finding increased administrative and compliance tasks a burden that might get too big to bear once extra tertiary qualifications pile up too.

Wealth Insights’ Adviser Sentiment Index also saw sentiment plummet to levels not seen since the ASX dropped well below 4,500 points in 2012.

The data also showed that, in their role as a financial planner, fewer than half of surveyed advisers indicated that times were “good” or “very good”, with 40 per cent indicating times were “average”, and 19 per cent indicating that times were “bad” or “very bad”.

But, while it looks all doom and gloom now, once the dust settles, Swieconek said the landscape will be completely different, with less competition and higher entry requirements giving planners a lot more leverage.

“The next three to six years looks really busy in terms of workloads, but once that happens, the landscape will see a lot more opportunity and the profession will be better regarded,” he said.

Anderson said he’d seen an uptake in members’ use of the AFA Care offer, which allows advisers to speak to a counsellor in confidence, and that continuing engagement and discussion around the changes is the key to staying positive.




Related Content

More than half of planners use ETFs

The adoption of exchange trade funds (ETFs) among Australian financial planners has continued to grow, with more than half of planners in the country ...Read more

Purchased a book of trails? Expect no ALP sympathy

A senior federal opposition front-bencher has signalled that financial planners who have purchased books of clients on the basis of trailing commissio...Read more

Advisers avoid ASIC enforcement spotlight

Financial planners may have found themselves front and centre at the Royal Commission but they were notably largely absent from the Australian Securit...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

I'm going to make a prediction. 2020 will see fewer advisers, nil free consultations, and a 20% increase in advice fees due to the costs of more compliance, more training, higher PI costs, higher ASIC costs, and anything else that comes out of the Banking RC. By 2025 we will have a federal budget problem due to increased aged pension costs, because people refused to pay the higher advice fees. I actually feel sorry for those who think they are doing "Mr average Australian" a favour.

Your right

And Mortgage Brokers are next. Labour will bring in full FOFA and customer paid fee-for-service there as well. Then ISN will step in with SME lending etc and try to crowd the banks out. And that is the real story. You keep thinking they are just misguided fools but they know exactly what they are doing. Banks are put of wealth, their distribution lines are destroyed for their products, SMSFs are next. The only Lib policy retort will be to put forward the removal of compulsive super contributions and make it a voluntary tax deduction.

It's a very interesting point, already we've seen a big super fund doing a debt lend to business ( Fox) and they could easily start to become dominant lenders to associated banks like ME and then takover/erode the banking monopoly - particularly if the banks are forced to get out of wealth. This could all lead to greater competition and the onus is on the big 4 to get it's act together.

Interesting idea. It would be hugely popular in the electorate, especially in the marginal, outer suburban seats. Who wouldn't want a near 10% increase in their pay packet? Plus small business hate all the complex red-tape. The Government would rake in more tax, so more money to spend on election promises. Plus the Industry funds would implode, so that source of ALP funding would be gone. Genius idea from a Coalition point of view. Wouldn't affect us too much though as engaged clients are motivated to build their wealth. So most would keep contributing I suspect. Not sure it would be a good idea for the long term future of this country, but hey, it's been a long time since politicians worried about that!

Add new comment