FPA warns that automation doesn’t always equate to innovation

8 November 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has warned the Government against allowing too much leeway with respect to the so-called regulatory sandbox, warning that just because a business is highly automated does necessarily make it innovative.

In a submission lodged with the Treasury this week, the FPA said that while it was prepared to support a framework in which the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) gives special weight to applications for relief for truly innovative business ideas, especially the testing of ideas, it was dubious about what represented innovation.

“To be clear, a heavily automated business is not necessarily innovative. Nor is yet another automated risk profiling tool or an [exchange traded fund] ETF investing tool,” the FPA submission said.

It said firms should be made to demonstrate they are genuinely innovative.

“Simply being heavily automated is not enough,” the submission said. “A close investigation is required to decide whether the firm is offering something genuinely novel and beneficial.”

The FPA said it would also be supportive of special consideration being given to the size of a firm, in circumstances where smaller firms might find it particularly difficult to enter the market.

“But, again, being small and heavily automated does not make a firm truly innovative (let alone innovative enough to outweigh the extra risk),” it said.

“In summary, a general exemption is inappropriate as there is a need to ascertain whether there is a net benefit,” it said. “This requires a close examination and a judgement. We should not let our excitement for the idea of innovation blind us to the risks.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND